This prop will be a better fit when the holder base grows and I hope the team resubmits in the future.

Voting against as I do not see a big need for this product and can't imagine using it myself. Appreciate the time writing the proposal and wish the team well!

don't think there's not enough demand for this yet but I like the team and hope we can see them in the future for another prop

not enough demand for nouns OTC atm, sudoswap works great and I anticipate anyone in the near future looking to buy OTC will already be connecting with the community on twitter or discord

Not enough PMF

Robert and atomic trade team are legit and I appreciate this proposal for thinking of ways the two could work together. However, I do not think this sort of idea would be bring enough value back to the dao for the ask

Respect the builders, but not enough value for Nouns. We need more value for Nouns + wilder props

Nouncil Vote:

20 Yes, 33 No, 5 Abstain

4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision

NO WINS

Vote Reasons & Discussion

wiz | "if we're going to be funding tech I think it should be entirely oss and public infrastructure"

Classic_Craig | "i really like the idea of being able to swap Nounish derivatives throughout the nouniverse in an easy manner. In terms of custom dev, 29 ETH is also very fair for this type of work. I look forward to being able to swap nounish nfts to engage in more nouns communities!"

pin.pusher | "I don't think there would be a huge demand for this. From looking over the activity on a few secondary markets over the last 6 months, there has only been 27 sales total between OS, LooksRare, and X2Y2. Most Nouns holders seem to be more interested in building within the community, utilizing their governance voting, or delegating their Noun(s) to another community member who is interested in doing either of those tasks"

Josep | "I don't think Nouns is a collection that has a lot of secondary sales activity, they are +30ETH NFTs and ,therefore, I doubt the transaction gas is relevant."

byhardy | "Not a big enough demand for this."

Brook | "I don’t see this being important enough to fund."

RyanMac ⌐◨-◨ | "atomic0.com is awesome & makes trading/swapping super easy"

0xDariush | "nouns are not for flippers in general, i don't believe owners care about fees! maybe in 5 years with more nouns in the ecosystem they care!"

nonodynamo | "I think trading is social and viral. I like this."

Benbodhi | "I like this, I think it has potential to enable safer swaps among the community for free, while also reaching outside of nouns ecosystem and introducing nouns to other token holders that might land on this exchange."

Mach | "just doesn't seem like something worth 35k. The technical difficult to execute this isn't worth it especially with so many viable alternatives existing already."

kerimbonia | "i think the proposal looks good, the ask is reasonable and i like the utility of having a zero-fee nft-nft exchange for nouns and nouns sub daos."

Mindtoasted | "Love the idea for this, I don't know if it could be a great way to trade NFTs at zero cost. I still can't find what the impact might be for Nouns, I don't feel quite Nounish on this, IMO I think this is a pretty big request that it could still be used for other impactful Nounish stuff, I have to vote no for this."

For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil

I like this. Feels like it has potential to become a popular swap platform that is constantly promoting nouns and nounish NFTs tastefully. It provides a place to do more secure swaps than sending eachother NFTs, even when they're cheap. The ability to add what you're looking for or have to offer is also cool, mixing it up with different things in one transaction.