Blank end ;(

nom nom Voadz

⌐◨-◨

https://www.lilnouns.wtf/vote/nounsdao/476/votes

FOR 98 VOTES
0xADa31Add8450CA0422983B9a3103633b78938617 | *"LIL NOUNCIL HAS SPOKEN

Delegate to Lil Nouncil here -> lilnouns.wtf/delegate?to=lilnouncil.eth"*
0x2eE0485f71764bcD2062A84d9455688c581B90f8 | "IMO a process should be in place to auto pass props like this. (previously passed)"

AGAINST 0 VOTES

ABSTAINS 54 VOTES
0x9e0e9D25a5ED9bc773f91691f0b45599255257B1 | "I'll only vote on proposals that require explanations once the proposer attends our weekly calls to explain them."

reVoteWithReason from toadyhawk.eth

The DAO already approved this proposal and we should stick to our word.

sent from voter.wtf

Agree with Toady Hawk.

The DAO already approved this proposal and we should stick to our word.

nounish

The Nouncil has spoken.

We discuss all Nouns proposals every week in our Discord https://discord.gg/fdjJpMeV6K. The calls are public and all are welcome!

You can find previous call recordings here: https://nouncil.notion.site/30328df718424f17a623859018497fc2?v=806b5234a2a34b619c3d5028bcd879f0&pvs=4

This was a resubmission prop (due to unrelated to prop issue) and the results of the Nouncil poll reflected support again on the second time around.

For - Wins

FOR - 26 VOTES

benbodhi | "Interesting turn of events to bring light to a technical limitation, lingering from governor bravo."

kwikgamedev | "."

AGAINST - 0 VOTES

ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES

The DAO already deliberated on this. GL

I like the project, but I think we need to see more traction before supporting an ask of this size. Looks like the first zine only has 16/50 minted. I'd also like to know the weekly/monthly active user numbers. Don't feel I can support spending a week + of auction proceeds on this based on what I know right now :)

sent from voter.wtf

⌐◨-◨