ProposalsProposal 717
ProposalsProposal 717
*Down to fund
Develop an algorithm for a wrist-wearable tracking device that can measure sexual pleasure and orgasm.
Video version of this proposal
95,000 USD
Set up fee for device platform .…. 5,000
One year access to the platform ….. 6,000
20 tracking devices @ 300/device .…. 6,000
One year research coordination (12hrs/week @ 50/hour) …. 31,000
Initial algorithm development (dev & compute resources) ….. 40,000
Recruitment and marketing …. 7,000
Total: 95,000
Sex is one of the most powerful human driving forces, shaping not only our social interactions and efforts towards our appearance, but sometimes our professional aspirations, personal goals, preferences, and identities (whether we are conscious of this or not). People are willing to go to incredible lengths to experience the deep, irreplaceable intimacy of connection with another person. And yet, once we get there, we often do not sufficiently understand what factors actually lead to a positive sexual experience.
The current field of sexual research is sadly lacking in vitality. For example, the Wikipedia entry on sex research in the 21st century is only four sentences long.
In the 1950s, Masters and Johnson were the first researchers to conduct sex research on subjects in the lab, resulting in the well-known “human sexual response cycle” theory. Today, there are some academic institutions (e.g. Kinsey Institute, Sage Lab) and a few independent researchers (e.g. Aella, Simone & Malcolm Collins) studying sexuality. However, experimental trials are rare due to the difficulty of recruiting participants, getting ethical approvals, and obtaining funding for potentially controversial research.
Even when we manage to conduct such studies, a lab environment almost certainly affects the subject’s sexual response. Imagine getting in the mood while hooked up to a vaginal or penile plethysmograph measuring the blood flow to your genitals. There is an opportunity to improve the generalizability of sex research by conducting it in a more realistic environment.
What is missing from sex research today is objectively measured (not self-reported) data that is collected in a naturalistic (non-clinical) setting. We believe that new technology in wearable tracking devices can enable this.
We had the opportunity to borrow a set of wrist-worn tracking devices for a period of several weeks. They are designed for research purposes, so unlike many popular tracking devices on the market, it was possible to access the raw sensor data that was recorded.
We distributed a few of these devices at a (“pop-up city”) conference. We asked people to record their data while engaging in sexual activity (either partnered or solo), and then press a button immediately after orgasm in order to label the event in the data.
In total, we recorded data from 5 different people across 15 sessions of sexual activity and 22 labeled orgasms.
Here is an example of a female participant’s recording of a 30 minute session of sexual activity during which she labeled three orgasms (the red dotted lines). The data are scaled so that they can be displayed on the same chart. It includes PPG sensors, SPO2, acceleration, and heart rate.
Notably, the third orgasm is the only one with a pronounced heart rate spike, although she subjectively felt that she came in each instance. This brings up an issue that will need to be considered – Can we trust the labeling of the data when it's hard for people to tell if they had a "real" orgasm? And how do we define a “real” orgasm? Is it subjective, physiologically objective, or both?
Unfortunately, this example was one of the cleanest data recordings that we got. Due to several issues, including timestamp inaccuracy, inconsistent columns, and erroneous button presses, most of the data was too messy to include in statistical modeling.
Although it did not result in much usable data, this pilot trial was very informative about how we can do better next time. We need a more reliable tool that can record raw biometric data with high frequency and accuracy. We also require an easy and accurate mechanism for labeling orgasms. (This is in no way a criticism of our partners, since the circumstances were such that they were unable to prepare the devices as they normally would. We thank them for graciously offering us free use of their devices.)
We need to go back to data collection, making sure we can collect biometric data with consistent columns across reporters, try to debug the timestamp issues, and see if we can use a better mechanism to record button presses. We would also ask for some baseline data from the participants, doing normal things that are not sex, to provide a comparison.
We should also refine our analysis by exploring heart rate patterns in greater detail. Specifically, we can estimate the curvature of the heart rate, developing a synthetic indicator that reflects the quick rise and fall. This is a commonly used technique in financial modeling. Early observations suggest that high heart rate combined with a significant negative heart rate curvature may correlate with orgasm, but we need to confirm this with more data.
Additionally, it would be beneficial to upgrade our hardware to capture individual heartbeats continuously, rather than relying on step function data, to enhance the accuracy and granularity of our findings. We have already discussed with another hardware provider that we believe will fit the bill for the requirements of this initiative.
Set up fee for device platform .…. 5,000
One year access to the platform ….. 6,000
20 tracking devices @ 300/device .…. 6,000
One year research coordination (12hrs/week @ 50/hour) …. 31,000
Initial algorithm development (dev & compute resources) ….. 40,000
Recruitment and marketing …. 7,000
Total: 95,000
I (Maia) am the founder of Cosimo Research, a scientific research service that investigates unconventional topics that are not addressed by traditional institutions. Cosimo is deeply integrated with the DeSci community through partnerships with ResearchHub, Biohacker DAO, and DeScier, and I participate in many DeSci events such as Vitalia, Edge Lanna, Edge Esmeralda, and DeSci London.
We have already conducted two novel scientific studies in the field of sex and human attraction – one on vabbing (using one’s vaginal fluid as perfume to attract men) and one on potential sources of male pheromones.
I am highly passionate about the development of this new technology which would allow us to expand our groundbreaking sex research in exciting new directions. I truly believe that it could revolutionize humanity’s scientific understanding of sexual pleasure. I love talking about this project, so please reach out with any questions. <3
Penile plethysmography, UF Health
*Down to fund
Develop an algorithm for a wrist-wearable tracking device that can measure sexual pleasure and orgasm.
Video version of this proposal
95,000 USD
Set up fee for device platform .…. 5,000
One year access to the platform ….. 6,000
20 tracking devices @ 300/device .…. 6,000
One year research coordination (12hrs/week @ 50/hour) …. 31,000
Initial algorithm development (dev & compute resources) ….. 40,000
Recruitment and marketing …. 7,000
Total: 95,000
Sex is one of the most powerful human driving forces, shaping not only our social interactions and efforts towards our appearance, but sometimes our professional aspirations, personal goals, preferences, and identities (whether we are conscious of this or not). People are willing to go to incredible lengths to experience the deep, irreplaceable intimacy of connection with another person. And yet, once we get there, we often do not sufficiently understand what factors actually lead to a positive sexual experience.
The current field of sexual research is sadly lacking in vitality. For example, the Wikipedia entry on sex research in the 21st century is only four sentences long.
In the 1950s, Masters and Johnson were the first researchers to conduct sex research on subjects in the lab, resulting in the well-known “human sexual response cycle” theory. Today, there are some academic institutions (e.g. Kinsey Institute, Sage Lab) and a few independent researchers (e.g. Aella, Simone & Malcolm Collins) studying sexuality. However, experimental trials are rare due to the difficulty of recruiting participants, getting ethical approvals, and obtaining funding for potentially controversial research.
Even when we manage to conduct such studies, a lab environment almost certainly affects the subject’s sexual response. Imagine getting in the mood while hooked up to a vaginal or penile plethysmograph measuring the blood flow to your genitals. There is an opportunity to improve the generalizability of sex research by conducting it in a more realistic environment.
What is missing from sex research today is objectively measured (not self-reported) data that is collected in a naturalistic (non-clinical) setting. We believe that new technology in wearable tracking devices can enable this.
We had the opportunity to borrow a set of wrist-worn tracking devices for a period of several weeks. They are designed for research purposes, so unlike many popular tracking devices on the market, it was possible to access the raw sensor data that was recorded.
We distributed a few of these devices at a (“pop-up city”) conference. We asked people to record their data while engaging in sexual activity (either partnered or solo), and then press a button immediately after orgasm in order to label the event in the data.
In total, we recorded data from 5 different people across 15 sessions of sexual activity and 22 labeled orgasms.
Here is an example of a female participant’s recording of a 30 minute session of sexual activity during which she labeled three orgasms (the red dotted lines). The data are scaled so that they can be displayed on the same chart. It includes PPG sensors, SPO2, acceleration, and heart rate.
Notably, the third orgasm is the only one with a pronounced heart rate spike, although she subjectively felt that she came in each instance. This brings up an issue that will need to be considered – Can we trust the labeling of the data when it's hard for people to tell if they had a "real" orgasm? And how do we define a “real” orgasm? Is it subjective, physiologically objective, or both?
Unfortunately, this example was one of the cleanest data recordings that we got. Due to several issues, including timestamp inaccuracy, inconsistent columns, and erroneous button presses, most of the data was too messy to include in statistical modeling.
Although it did not result in much usable data, this pilot trial was very informative about how we can do better next time. We need a more reliable tool that can record raw biometric data with high frequency and accuracy. We also require an easy and accurate mechanism for labeling orgasms. (This is in no way a criticism of our partners, since the circumstances were such that they were unable to prepare the devices as they normally would. We thank them for graciously offering us free use of their devices.)
We need to go back to data collection, making sure we can collect biometric data with consistent columns across reporters, try to debug the timestamp issues, and see if we can use a better mechanism to record button presses. We would also ask for some baseline data from the participants, doing normal things that are not sex, to provide a comparison.
We should also refine our analysis by exploring heart rate patterns in greater detail. Specifically, we can estimate the curvature of the heart rate, developing a synthetic indicator that reflects the quick rise and fall. This is a commonly used technique in financial modeling. Early observations suggest that high heart rate combined with a significant negative heart rate curvature may correlate with orgasm, but we need to confirm this with more data.
Additionally, it would be beneficial to upgrade our hardware to capture individual heartbeats continuously, rather than relying on step function data, to enhance the accuracy and granularity of our findings. We have already discussed with another hardware provider that we believe will fit the bill for the requirements of this initiative.
Set up fee for device platform .…. 5,000
One year access to the platform ….. 6,000
20 tracking devices @ 300/device .…. 6,000
One year research coordination (12hrs/week @ 50/hour) …. 31,000
Initial algorithm development (dev & compute resources) ….. 40,000
Recruitment and marketing …. 7,000
Total: 95,000
I (Maia) am the founder of Cosimo Research, a scientific research service that investigates unconventional topics that are not addressed by traditional institutions. Cosimo is deeply integrated with the DeSci community through partnerships with ResearchHub, Biohacker DAO, and DeScier, and I participate in many DeSci events such as Vitalia, Edge Lanna, Edge Esmeralda, and DeSci London.
We have already conducted two novel scientific studies in the field of sex and human attraction – one on vabbing (using one’s vaginal fluid as perfume to attract men) and one on potential sources of male pheromones.
I am highly passionate about the development of this new technology which would allow us to expand our groundbreaking sex research in exciting new directions. I truly believe that it could revolutionize humanity’s scientific understanding of sexual pleasure. I love talking about this project, so please reach out with any questions. <3
Penile plethysmography, UF Health