Agree with jarmen and gramajo

Love this move! Here’s to amplified yields and bold growth. Full support!

fuck yeah

Votes from $nogs holders ⌐◨-◨

FOR: 2.16M $nogs

AGAINST: 384.47M $nogs

Prop 818: Stake 1000 ETH to mETH

The poll is closed.

against won

AGAINST - 18 VOTES

FOR - 3 VOTES

ABSTAINS - 14 VOTES

All for diversifying our yield sources and cultivating partnerships with top protocols like Mantle.

This partnership with mETH Protocol could diversify our treasury strategies and bring in some fresh ideas. Plus, the 5 million MNT token delegation shows they're serious about working with us. It's a win-win if we can boost our yields and explore new opportunities together.

Was on the fence initially but this is a good partnership evidenced by the delegation. The announcement on the new onchain banking feature by mantle is epic. We need strong partnerships to keep funding the weird stuff that makes Nouns, nouns. Defi is boring for most folks, I get it. Like Stripeymofo said, would love to see them go deep on Nouns or helping us do weird stuff. It was never just about the yield since we’re playing it safe. It was always about what else a partner can bring to the table.

FOR 9 VOTES

pipe da snowman | "meth is good for me"

AGAINST 34 VOTES

ABSTAIN 0 VOTES

does mantle need a mascot

despite abstaining and missing the voting deadline of prop 816 even after consulting my delegations, on this sort of DeFi related type of proposals. i feel like this proposal is a follow up from 809 and 810, cross DAO pollination is what starts pushing the DeFi envelope. Good luck to team!

Same voting reason as Prop 810.

We got a chance to partner with a top 10 staked ETH provider, who wants to work with Nouns and check out our ecosystem. For Nouns to succeed, Ethereum’s gotta succeed, and having a big player in staking on our side is a win.
I would like Mantle to do more than just watch how Nouns runs. I hope they get in deep with our community, maybe throw some cash at Nouns community projects, donate to our treasury, or have MNT Team bid on Nouns auctions and switch up their PFPs to show alignment. They could fund projects and ideas that fit Nouns This is a shot to show the skeptical folks this aint just a shallow look-see or them poking around. By putting in real work, like funding, jumping in, and sharing goals, can show they mean business about building something big with Nouns.

• Executive Summary: The proposal to stake 1000 ETH in mETH aims to optimize treasury yield but presents significant financial risks and lacks clear alignment with NounsDAO's core mission under current constraints. 2. Key Scoring Rationale: Mission alignment is moderate (6) as the proposal seeks to enhance treasury yield, aligning with sustainability goals, but lacks direct contribution to NounsDAO's core mission of meme proliferation and public goods funding. Financial viability is low (5) due to the high risk of staking a substantial portion of the treasury in a single protocol, especially given the current financial distress. Community impact is limited (4) as the proposal does not directly engage or benefit the community. Innovation value is moderate (5) as it introduces a new yield strategy but lacks groundbreaking innovation. Execution feasibility is relatively high (7) due to the established nature of mETH and its security audits. 3. Financial Analysis: The proposal involves reallocating 1000 ETH, a significant portion of the remaining treasury, into mETH. While it offers potential yield enhancement, the risk of capital loss or reduced liquidity is substantial, especially in a volatile market. 4. Risk/Benefit Assessment: The primary benefit is potential yield increase, but risks include market volatility, protocol-specific risks, and reduced liquidity. The proposal does not provide a clear risk mitigation strategy or contingency plan. 5. Final Decision Logic: Given the current financial constraints and the need for treasury protection, the proposal's risks outweigh its potential benefits. The lack of direct alignment with NounsDAO's mission and the significant financial commitment required make it an unsuitable choice under the current circumstances. Voting 'against' maximizes long-term value by prioritizing treasury preservation and strategic alignment with core objectives.

Don’t see the benefit to the DAO. If anything, participating in governance in other DAO’s before figuring out our own governance seems like a detrimental distraction.

It sounds like this would provide a lot of benefit to Mantle, but I'm not sure what the benefit to Nouns would be. We already do staking, and sending 1000 ETH to something the majority of us don't have the time to deep dive into sounds risky.

I don't fully understand the reasons behind this proposal or its potential effects on Nouns, so I'm voting against it just in case.

not obvious how this emphasizes noun o clock