Nouns web hosting is already decentralized and resilient. Multiple clients. All open source. Actual DAO lives on Ethereum which has never expereinced any downtime. While I see value in a decentralized cloud, I don't think Nouns will see any benefits from the current proposal.

I appreciate what the Moosh team is building, but I think the ask is too big. I think the Nouns DAO could support Moosh Network with a smaller grant - not for the purpose of running Nouns apps on Moosh, but rather to support an open-source public goods project, which is in line with the decentralized and permissionless ethos. For bigger funding, I think Moosh should turn to larger organizations, for example Octant and EF.

I support the team's efforts and wish them the best, but even if we trust that all promises will be delivered, it's not clear to me what benefits Moosh could have for Nouns that aren't already available from other established peer-to-peer networks and cloud marketplaces. For $60k, would expect this to more clear.

Also concerns me that Nouns would be a primary funder of a high-risk early stage project that will require significant capital. If Nouns were to receive meaningful upside in Moosh's potential future success, that would mitigate this concern, but even then I am not sure we're the best fit to be a 'lead investor.' To nekofar's point, would need to see the team secure more funding (or traction) beyond Nouns to have confidence that the network will be sustainable and people will be sufficiently incentivized to buy and run the hardware long term.

Not a fan of putting teams on a time based payroll like here with 3 months. More supportive of results based proposals.
Away from „in 3 months we want to deliver“ to „with this budget we will deliver“