This proposal adds a new head trait: Dire Wolf
Showcase noun:
Trait Artwork:
Circle Crop:
Pallette: 2 colors
Hi, it’s me again — Nadiecito — here once more to try and prove that Nouns is an infinite collaborative artwork.
Everything can, and maybe should, be a Noun.
Some would argue that we already have a werewolf. But I insist that this is a completely different category (cryptids), and in a collection that aspires to infinity, there is room for both the wolf and the werewolf.
This is my third attempt at the wolf. It was inspired by recent news about experiments using dire wolf's DNA to bring the species back to life. That idea made me feel the wolf deserved another chance to exist within Nouns as a head trait.
The question isn’t whether the wolf should belong in Nouns as a head.
The real question is whether this iteration of the wolf head is good enough to enter the infinite work of art.
"a wolf doesn't concern itself with the opinion of sheep"
Everynoun should love wolves
The idea of a wolf Noun isn’t extinct.
Nouns Art Contribution Agreement
Signer: 0x215db99298af65306a4c60bd3b7612d5f60b03d7
Message: I, the individual controlling Ethereum address 0x215db99298af65306a4c60bd3b7612d5f60b03d7, hereby waive all copyright and all related or neighboring rights, together with any associated claims or causes of action, to the extent permitted by law. I have read and understand the terms and intended legal effect of the Nouns Art Contribution Agreement, available at https://ern3fbtsj23a2achuj5kqa4xtp2yvplqjy2r6cemo6ep52lfn2cq.arweave.net/JFuyhnJOtg0AR6J6qAOXm_WKvXBONR8IjHeI_ullboU, and hereby voluntarily elect to apply it to this contribution.
This proposal adds a new head trait: Dire Wolf
Showcase noun:
Trait Artwork:
Circle Crop:
Pallette: 2 colors
Hi, it’s me again — Nadiecito — here once more to try and prove that Nouns is an infinite collaborative artwork.
Everything can, and maybe should, be a Noun.
Some would argue that we already have a werewolf. But I insist that this is a completely different category (cryptids), and in a collection that aspires to infinity, there is room for both the wolf and the werewolf.
This is my third attempt at the wolf. It was inspired by recent news about experiments using dire wolf's DNA to bring the species back to life. That idea made me feel the wolf deserved another chance to exist within Nouns as a head trait.
The question isn’t whether the wolf should belong in Nouns as a head.
The real question is whether this iteration of the wolf head is good enough to enter the infinite work of art.
"a wolf doesn't concern itself with the opinion of sheep"
Everynoun should love wolves
The idea of a wolf Noun isn’t extinct.
Nouns Art Contribution Agreement
Signer: 0x215db99298af65306a4c60bd3b7612d5f60b03d7
Message: I, the individual controlling Ethereum address 0x215db99298af65306a4c60bd3b7612d5f60b03d7, hereby waive all copyright and all related or neighboring rights, together with any associated claims or causes of action, to the extent permitted by law. I have read and understand the terms and intended legal effect of the Nouns Art Contribution Agreement, available at https://ern3fbtsj23a2achuj5kqa4xtp2yvplqjy2r6cemo6ep52lfn2cq.arweave.net/JFuyhnJOtg0AR6J6qAOXm_WKvXBONR8IjHeI_ullboU, and hereby voluntarily elect to apply it to this contribution.